From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266572AbUA3CLp (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:11:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266591AbUA3CLp (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:11:45 -0500 Received: from CPE-65-30-34-80.kc.rr.com ([65.30.34.80]:26006 "EHLO cognition.home.hanaden.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266572AbUA3CLn (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:11:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4019BD48.60905@hanaden.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:11:20 -0600 From: hanasaki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031221 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Brown CC: Mike Fedyk , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [NFS] NFS rpc and stale handles on 2.6.x servers References: <4014675D.2040405@hanaden.com> <16409.43367.545322.356713@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20040130012534.GE2445@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> <16409.46352.877421.233677@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <16409.46352.877421.233677@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add this to your exportfs "no_subtree_check" It seems to be a temp workaround. Searching the web, the only issue with this option seems to be a minor performance hit (big issue for large systems). Any chance of getting the patch 2.6.2? www.kernel.org looks like its still on an RC2 of this. Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday January 29, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > >>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: >> >>>On Sunday January 25, hanasaki@hanaden.com wrote: >>> >>>>The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers >>>>running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or >>>>what? Thanks >>>> RPC request reserved 0 but used 124 >>>> >>>>Debian sarge >>>>nfs-kernel-server >>>>am-untils >>>>nfsv3 over tcp >>>> >>> >>>stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will >>>be in 2.6.3. >> >>do you mean 2.6.2? > > > Yeh, 2.6.2 as well.. But definitely 2.6.3 :-) > > >>I've merged the nfsd stale file handles into 2.6.1-bk2 and it is working >>fine on a nfs server here... > > > good, thanks. > NeilBrown