From: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <PrakashKC@gmx.de>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
Cc: trelane@digitasaru.net, Luke-Jr <luke7jr@yahoo.com>,
swsusp-devel <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:19:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <401B7312.3060207@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1075540107.17727.90.camel@laptop-linux>
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 22:03, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>
>>>Get the latest 2.6.1 patch (revision 7) and latest core patch (2.0) from
>>>http://swsusp.sf.net.
>>
>>I am sorry, I only see a rev 6 patch. Will that also work?
>
>
> You're right. I got the revision number for 2.4.24 stuck in my head.
> rev6 is the right one.
Ok, just trying it out. So far:
Doing the kernel patch to 2.6.2-rc3, it asks me about a file missing in
xfs. I skipped it. Then I used your patch you sent to lkml to fix things
up. Finally I applied the core patch. Now it asks me
The next patch would create the file kernel/power/swsusp2.c,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Should this happen? What to do now?
Prakash
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-31 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-30 4:24 Software Suspend 2.0 Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-30 10:04 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-30 10:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-30 10:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 18:09 ` Micha Feigin
2004-02-05 0:47 ` Software Suspend 2.0 [for 2.6.2 resend] Hugang
2004-01-31 6:22 ` [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0 Luke-Jr
2004-01-31 6:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 6:48 ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31 6:56 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 7:16 ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31 7:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 7:38 ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31 7:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 8:32 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 9:03 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31 9:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 9:19 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam [this message]
2004-01-31 9:51 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 10:43 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31 13:25 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-31 23:11 ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31 22:15 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-01 0:26 ` Micha Feigin
2004-02-01 1:48 ` oops with 2.6.1-rc1 and rc-3 Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-01 2:54 ` Micha Feigin
2004-02-01 10:36 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-01 11:37 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31 9:35 ` [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0 Éric Brunet
2004-01-31 9:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 7:22 ` Luke-Jr
2004-01-31 7:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 8:09 ` Luke-Jr
2004-01-31 8:11 ` Luke-Jr
2004-01-31 8:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 15:23 ` Sebastian Kugler
2004-02-01 7:08 ` Hugang
2004-02-02 17:01 ` swsusp2 on ppc [Re: Software Suspend 2.0] Marco Giordani
2004-02-03 1:37 ` Hugang
2004-02-03 12:07 ` Marco Giordani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=401B7312.3060207@gmx.de \
--to=prakashkc@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke7jr@yahoo.com \
--cc=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trelane@digitasaru.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox