From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265431AbUBAR75 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:59:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265433AbUBAR75 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:59:57 -0500 Received: from kluizenaar.xs4all.nl ([213.84.184.247]:1725 "EHLO samwel.tk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265431AbUBAR7z (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:59:55 -0500 Message-ID: <401D3E97.5080902@samwel.tk> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 18:59:51 +0100 From: Bart Samwel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031221 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: reiser@namesys.com Subject: Reiserfs flags question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bart@samwel.tk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everyone, I was looking at fs/reiserfs/inode.c, and I noticed that the functions sd_attrs_to_i_attrs and i_attrs_to_sd_attrs are not exact inverses: i_attrs_to_sd_attrs doesn't convert the S_APPEND flag to REISERFS_APPEND_FL, but sd_attrs_to_i_attrs does convert REISERFS_APPEND_FL to S_APPEND. I was wondering, is this intentional? --Bart