public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 10:52:52 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <401D9154.9060903@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040201151111.4a6b64c3.akpm@osdl.org>



Andrew Morton wrote:

>Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>The machine is a dual P3 450MHz, 512MB, aic7xxx, 2 disk RAID-0 and
>> ReiserFS.  It's a few years old and has always run Linux, most
>> recently 2.4.24.  I decided to try 2.6.1 and the performance is
>> disappointing.
>>
>
>2.6 has a few performance problems under heavy pageout at present.  Nick
>Piggin has some patches which largely fix it up.
>
>
>> My test is a software build of about 200 source files (written in C)
>> that I usually build using "nice make -j4".
>>
>
>Tried -j3?
>
>

Its got 512MB RAM though so its not swapping, is it?

Philip, can you please send about 30 seconds of vmstat 1
output for 2.4 and 2.6 while the test is running. Thanks


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-01 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-01 21:34 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs Philip Martin
2004-02-01 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-01 23:42   ` Philip Martin
2004-02-01 23:52   ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-02-02  0:51     ` Philip Martin
2004-02-02  5:15       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02  8:58         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 18:36           ` Philip Martin
2004-02-02 23:36             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 23:49               ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03  1:01                 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03  3:02                   ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-03 16:44                     ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03  0:34               ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03  3:52                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 18:08         ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03  3:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03 16:46   ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03 21:29     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03 21:53       ` Philip Martin
2004-02-04  5:48         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 17:50           ` Philip Martin
2004-02-04 23:38             ` Philip Martin
2004-02-05  2:49               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 14:27                 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-14  0:10       ` Philip Martin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-03  6:55 Samium Gromoff
2004-02-03  7:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03  7:52   ` Samium Gromoff
2004-02-03  7:57     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-03 15:58       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-03  7:13 ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=401D9154.9060903@cyberone.com.au \
    --to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip@codematters.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox