From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265577AbUBBCml (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:42:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265580AbUBBCml (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:42:41 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:50823 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265577AbUBBCmj (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:42:39 -0500 Message-ID: <401DB912.5030602@pobox.com> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:42:26 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mark M. Hoffman" CC: LKML Subject: Re: 2.6 EXTRAVERSION is bad for -rcX-bkY's References: <20040202020053.GB21554@earth.solarsys.private> In-Reply-To: <20040202020053.GB21554@earth.solarsys.private> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > E.g. > > EXTRAVERSION for 2.6.2-rc3-bk1 is "-bk1"; it should be "-rc3-bk1" no? > > http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv2.6%2Fsnapshots%2Fpatch-2.6.2-rc3-bk1.bz2;z=1 Yeah, that definitely sounds like a bug... Jeff