From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265765AbUBBSkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:40:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265832AbUBBSkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:40:41 -0500 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:23314 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265765AbUBBSki (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:40:38 -0500 Message-ID: <401E9AB2.8020005@techsource.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 13:45:07 -0500 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DaMouse Networks CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chip References: <20040201145827.059332d3@EozVul.WORKGROUP> <401E85EA.7010209@techsource.com> <20040202173719.52952f7f@EozVul.WORKGROUP> In-Reply-To: <20040202173719.52952f7f@EozVul.WORKGROUP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DaMouse Networks wrote: >>So, do you all honestly think that adding cost to the board is going to >>make it sell? >> > > > More cost? how is saving money on the BIOS raising cost? also the SMP thing would allow like a ton of cheap chips to be stuck on with uber glue :) > I was talking about adding more chips as being something that would raise costs.