* Auto-regulated swappiness
@ 2004-02-03 20:49 Timothy Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Timothy Miller @ 2004-02-03 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
I just noticed the kerneltrap article about Con's new patchset. In
particular, I am curious about the auto-regulated swappiness.
I've done a little searching through the archives, but I can't seem to
find the lkml posts I'm thinking about. In any event, I vaguely
remember two things:
- auto-regulation was developed because the kernel seemed to swap too
much or too little under certain circumstances.
- Someone said that auto-regulating swappiness didn't make sense,
because there was some constant value that should have had the desired
effect.
I don't remember there being a resolution to this discussion.
For my own curiosity, what happens if swappiness is too high but there
isn't any pressure to swap from memory usage? Do user pages get swapped
out in favor of making room for potential buffer pages?
What happens if it's too low and there's lots of pressure to swap?
How does the auto-regulator fix this?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-02-03 20:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-03 20:49 Auto-regulated swappiness Timothy Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox