From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265981AbUBDImR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:42:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266101AbUBDImR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:42:17 -0500 Received: from mail-05.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.37]:20405 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265981AbUBDImQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:42:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4020B05E.3080909@cyberone.com.au> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 19:42:06 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: More VM benchmarks References: <40205908.4080600@cyberone.com.au> <40207B67.7040407@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <40207B67.7040407@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Nick Piggin wrote: > >> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/5/ >> Sorry to keep replying to myself. I've done some runs with my IO scheduler regression tests and these patches don't make a significant difference one way or the other although the results with the patches are generally a bit better. Tested OraSim pgbench nickbench tiobench and the read/ls kernel tree during a streaming read/write. 256MB RAM this time.