From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265321AbUBFJ3I (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 04:29:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265338AbUBFJ3I (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 04:29:08 -0500 Received: from imap.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:24471 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265321AbUBFJ3A (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 04:29:00 -0500 X-Authenticated: #4512188 Message-ID: <40235E53.4060504@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:28:51 +0100 From: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Luis_Miguel_Garc=EDa?= CC: Craig Bradney , david+challenge-response@blue-labs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.verweij@student.tudelft.nl Subject: Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet References: <402298C7.5050405@wanadoo.es> <40229D2C.20701@blue-labs.org> <4022B55B.1090309@wanadoo.es> <20040205154059.6649dd74.akpm@osdl.org> <1076026496.16107.23.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <4022DE3C.1080905@wanadoo.es> <4022E209.3040909@gmx.de> <4022E3C8.4020704@wanadoo.es> <4022E69B.5070606@gmx.de> <1076029281.23586.36.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <4022E954.3060300@wanadoo.es> In-Reply-To: <4022E954.3060300@wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Luis Miguel García wrote: > Craig Bradney wrote: > >> On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 01:58, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: >> >> >>>> There is a way to "activate" cpu Disconnect? or it gets enabled by >>>> simply applying it? >>>> >>> I have an Abit NF7-S Rev2 with latest Bios. >>> > > Prakash, I have the same motherboard but not the latest bios (I think I > cannot overclock in the same way when I flashed the latest, so I > reverted one version). Perhaps I must upgrade and try. > > About the "option" you're talking about in the bios, are you talking > about CPU throttle? Nope, it is called cpu disconnect... > Craig, I'm not talking about cpu disconnect because of the stability. I > have 100% stability here with the two patches mentioned before in this > thread. I was talking about my cpu showing temperatures between 53 and > 64º, what I think is very high. Do you only have stability with those two patches? I mean WITHOUT Disconnect I don't need those patches to have stability (with certain kernels...). At least the delay patch is not needed. The timer irq mapping patch might be usefull, but i am not 100% sure. Prakash