From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266981AbUBFXI0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:08:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265807AbUBFXI0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:08:26 -0500 Received: from mail-02.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.34]:61409 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266983AbUBFXIJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:08:09 -0500 Message-ID: <40241DC9.6070108@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:05:45 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marcel cotta CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM patches (please review) References: <40241C96.6010602@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <40241C96.6010602@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org marcel cotta wrote: > hey nick > > these patches are working great for me (k7-2400+,256mb ram) > > whenever about 100M of swap were in use, the system was > nearly unusable when i switched to another app under X > > with your patches i got interactivity back and it nearly feals like 2.4 > > thanks :) > That's great Marcel, thanks for the feedback. The patches are in Andrew's -mm tree now so they should work their way into 2.6 after some more review and testing. Nick