From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262055AbUBHDel (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:34:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262123AbUBHDek (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:34:40 -0500 Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.102]:42957 "EHLO pimout3-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262055AbUBHDej (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:34:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4025AE98.3090601@myrealbox.com> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:35:52 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040207 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.1] Kernel panic with ppa driver updates References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > Very interesting... Could you add > printk("dev = %p, dev->cur_cmd = %p\n", dev, dev->cur_cmd); > right before the call of ppa_pb_claim() call in __ppa_attach(), the > same - right before if (dev->wanted) in the same function and > printk("dev = %p, dev->cur_cmd set to %p\n", dev, dev->cur_cmd); > right after dev->cur_cmd = cmd; in ppa_queuecommand()? Only one of the print statements was executed, apparently: ppa: Version 2.07 (for Linux 2.4.x) dev = dfd67940, dev->cur_cmd = 7232b2df Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 7232b403 printing eip: c027bc25 The remainder of the message was identical to the previous post -- no extra printed messages anywhere.