From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265478AbUBKOSf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:18:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265264AbUBKOSf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:18:35 -0500 Received: from wsip-68-14-253-125.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.14.253.125]:18825 "EHLO office.labsysgrp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264477AbUBKOSd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:18:33 -0500 Message-ID: <402A39B2.1010207@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:18:26 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" Organization: Back to Basics Network Management User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ATARAID userspace configuration tool References: <1076425115.23946.18.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <40292246.2030902@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <1076440714.27328.8.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040211013551.GB2153@kroah.com> <4029892C.2070009@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <1076499258.5253.1.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> In-Reply-To: <1076499258.5253.1.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christophe Saout wrote: > Aren't the disks the ATARAID is made of usually on the same controller? > Then you only have to scan that one. Yes, that would be a simple optimization for this case. I was envisioning the future tools to handle existing MD and LVM autodetection and that would require looking at all potential block devices.