From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265942AbUBKRrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:47:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265946AbUBKRrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:47:13 -0500 Received: from lgsx01.lg.ehu.es ([158.227.2.34]:25563 "EHLO lgsx13.lg.ehu.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265942AbUBKRrM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:47:12 -0500 Message-ID: <402A6A98.5020404@wanadoo.es> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:47:04 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Luis_Miguel_Garc=EDa?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031206 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LINUX KERNEL MAILING LIST Subject: About highmem in 2.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, When I first installed 2.4, someone told me that if I had 1 gb ram it was better to not use highmem because those extra aditional mb was not worth the speed penalty of using the feature. Sorry for my ignorance (and my sucking english) but must I enable highmem now with 2.6? or have it any speed penalty althought? Thanks a lot!