public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc.
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:14:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <402D5A46.4090409@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040213223949.GA13937@alpha.home.local>



Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:19:59PM -0500, Timothy Miller wrote:
>  
> 
>>Assuming that the "buffered" speeds are being buffered by the OS, we'll 
>>ignore those.  I am therefore observing that the writes to a single 
>>drive are 3 to 4 times faster than they are through the RAID controller, 
>>even with the 3ware write cache ON.
>>
>>Does that make any sense?
> 
> 
> Well, it reminds me a disk I had problems with several years ago. It had
> a few defects in the FAT area, which were relocated at the end. Performance
> was terrible since the head had to move constantly. It took ages to install
> Win31 on it, so it finally was returned to the vendor. But in your case it
> seems a little bit different since you experience slow writes anywhere on
> the medium. Would it be possible that your controller does something like
> read-modify-write because of too big chunk size ?
> 

I'm getting 10-15 meg/sec even with the largest block sizes.  With dd, I 
  set the block size to 1 megabyte, so there's no chance that the block 
being written is too small or that the disk block is too big.

Also, it's a RAID1.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-13 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-12 23:32 File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc Timothy Miller
2004-02-13  5:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-02-13 19:19   ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-13 22:39     ` Willy Tarreau
2004-02-13 23:14       ` Timothy Miller [this message]
2004-02-13 19:30   ` Eric D. Mudama
2004-02-13 19:55     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-13 20:44       ` John Bradford
2004-02-13 22:45       ` Willy Tarreau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-13 12:23 Daniel Blueman
2004-02-13 14:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-13 14:44   ` Daniel Blueman
2004-02-13 16:15     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-13 22:56 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-14 18:16 Walt H
2004-02-16 17:53 ` Timothy Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=402D5A46.4090409@techsource.com \
    --to=miller@techsource.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox