From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263793AbUBODV2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:21:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263806AbUBODV2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:21:28 -0500 Received: from host-64-65-253-246.alb.choiceone.net ([64.65.253.246]:24015 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263793AbUBODV0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:21:26 -0500 Message-ID: <402EE151.4000807@tmr.com> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:02:41 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Davis CC: lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix make rpm in 2.6 when using RH9 or Fedora.. References: <402BD507.2040201@lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <402BD507.2040201@lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Davis wrote: > Doing a 'make rpm' with any linux-2.6 (or probably, even linux-2.4 > kernel) will fail with the current RH/Fedora RPM macros. > > The failure message is this: > > Processing files: kernel-debuginfo-2.6.3rc1mm1-12 > error: Could not open %files file > /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.3rc1mm1/debugfiles.list: No such file > or directory > > > RPM build errors: > Could not open %files file > /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.3rc1mm1/debugfiles.list: No such file > or directory > make: *** [rpm] Error 1 > > > The fix is this patch: > > --- linux-2.6/scripts/mkspec 2004-01-08 22:59:04.000000000 -0800 > +++ linux-2.6.3-rc1-mm1/scripts/mkspec 2004-02-12 00:02:55.000000000 -0800 > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ > echo "BuildRoot: /var/tmp/%{name}-%{PACKAGE_VERSION}-root" > echo "Provides: $PROVIDES" > echo "%define __spec_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress || :" > +echo "%define debug_package %{nil}" > echo "" > echo "%description" > echo "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself" Why do you want to disable the missing file check? As opposed to providing the file? I personally fix ther problem instead of disabling the check, the list can be empty, of course. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979