public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Steve Simitzis <steve@saturn5.com>
Cc: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 problems in 2.6.x
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:22:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <402EE603.8020106@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040215023226.GE1040@saturn5.com>

Steve Simitzis wrote:
> i should have mentioned in my email that i tried every combination of
> settings: auto-neg on the box and forced on the switch, both forced
> (to the same settings, of course), forced on the box with auto-neg on
> the switch, and auto-neg on both sides. in all cases, the result was
> the same: RX packet errors and the same watchdog messages. what i thought
> was particularly strange was that the switch refused to auto-negotiate
> full duplex.
> 
> (someone on another list suggested to try booting with the noapic
> option, which i tried for good measure, even though i don't see
> how that could have helped. again, no improvement.)
> 
> i was initially tempted to assume they were hardware problems, until
> i noticed that the problems only appeared when running a 2.6 kernel.
> also, the machines are only a few months old, so i'm assuming that
> all the hardware is modern enough to do the right thing.
> 
> if there's anything you'd recommend trying out, please let me know.
> i considered trying to run the 2.4.22 driver in a 2.6 installation,
> but i didn't know if any of the driver code depended on anything else
> elsewhere in the kernel source.
> 
> On 02/14/04, "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com> wrote: 
> 
> 
>>>another oddity is that even after forcing my interfaces to 
>>>100 Mbps full duplex, my switch is reporting half duplex. 
>>>again, this only happens in 2.6.x. when running 2.4.22, full 
>>>duplex is properly negotiated between the e1000 and my switch.
>>
>>Are you forcing both the e1000 interfaces and the switch ports to the
>>same forced settings?  A duplex mismatch would cause problems, but I'm
>>not sure why this is happening for 2.6 only.  What happens if you don't
>>force settings, and just rely on autoneg?  (Again, on both ends of the
>>wire).

1 - check your cables in case 2.6 is checking (or not) something
2 - set your NIC half to match the switch and see if there's a different 
problem.

Switches and NICs, especially nice new ones, don't always or even 
usually auto-auto, at least with any of the stuff I have. I have one 
system which works well full when the switch negotiates full and the NIC 
gets half. Any other force usually works poorly. If the NIC comes up 
helf just kick it into full in rc.local (ethtool, mii-tool, whatever) as 
long as the switch convinces itself that it's full.

I see this with 2.4 as well, so I'm familiar if not expert.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   CTO TMR Associates, Inc
   Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-15  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-15  0:26 e1000 problems in 2.6.x Feldman, Scott
2004-02-15  2:32 ` Steve Simitzis
2004-02-15  3:22   ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2004-02-15  3:53     ` Steve Simitzis
2004-02-15  8:16     ` Re[2]: " Elikster
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-16  4:17 Paul Blazejowski
2004-02-17 18:26 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-15 15:20 Re[2]: " Klaus Dittrich
2004-02-16  1:14 ` Re[3]: " Elikster
2004-02-16  2:12   ` Steve Simitzis
2004-02-14 11:13 Steve Simitzis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=402EE603.8020106@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
    --cc=steve@saturn5.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox