From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: opw-kernel@googlegroups.com
Cc: Aya Mahfouz <mahfouz.saif.elyazal@gmail.com>,
ursula.braun@de.ibm.com, blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OPW kernel] [PATCH v3] drivers: s390: net: ctcm: migrate variables to handle y2038 problem
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:40:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4030959.mWGrEP99VU@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141101001614.GA9494@localhost.localdomain>
On Saturday 01 November 2014 02:16:14 Aya Mahfouz wrote:
> This patch is concerned with migrating the time variables for the s390
> network driver. The changes handle the y2038 problem where timespec will
> overflow in the year 2038. timespec was replaced by unsigned long and
> all time variables get their values from the jiffies global variable.
> This was done for the sake of speed and efficiency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aya Mahfouz <mahfouz.saif.elyazal@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1: Arnd has advised me to provide you with options for time
> calculation. The first option: "accuracy" is used in this
> patch. The second option: "speed" can be done through
> jiffies.
>
> v2: Moved on to the speed option. Let me know if I explicitly
> need to include the jiffies header. The module compiles with
> no problems on my side.
>
> v3: Handled the error pointed out by Ursula. The current version
> does not handle overflows. There are two solutions for this.
> The first is to use jiffies_64 since s/390 is a 64-bit
> architecture after all. The second is to use wrapper functions
> like time_before and time_after. Two files were added too.
> They are: ctcm_main.c and netiucv.c. This patch could be sent
> as a patchset in its final version for convenience.
Hi Aya,
The patch looks correct to me now,
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
There is one small change that you could do for efficiency:
>
> - duration =
> - (done_stamp.tv_sec - ch->prof.send_stamp.tv_sec) * 1000000 +
> - (done_stamp.tv_nsec - ch->prof.send_stamp.tv_nsec) / 1000;
> + duration = jiffies_to_usecs(done_stamp - ch->prof.send_stamp);
> if (duration > ch->prof.tx_time)
> ch->prof.tx_time = duration;
>
This means you are doing the jiffies_to_usecs conversion for every
packet. s390 has a fast multiplication instruction, so it won't matter
in practice, but if you do more conversions like this, a better approach
is to store the 'jiffies' value in ch->prof.tx_time and only convert
it to another unit when printing the number.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-01 0:16 [PATCH v3] drivers: s390: net: ctcm: migrate variables to handle y2038 problem Aya Mahfouz
2014-11-03 9:32 ` Ursula Braun
2014-11-03 9:40 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4030959.mWGrEP99VU@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mahfouz.saif.elyazal@gmail.com \
--cc=opw-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ursula.braun@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox