From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
To: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@kth.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:11:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4030A561.8070701@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xy8r3e7gb.fsf@ford.guide>
Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> writes:
>
>
> /proc/modules uses only _ so you could use ${module_name/-/_}.
>
Please check the archive: My original complaint was about the
inconsistency between /proc/modules listing all modules with '_',
and the module filenames using both '-' and '_'. For me it is
not important which version is better. As a developer I have to
assume that '_' and '-' are ambiguous in this context. This
ambiguity is pretty strange for Unix, isn't it?
Regards
Harri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1o903-5d8-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pkw6-3BU-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1prnS-4x8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-15 15:02 ` 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 7:21 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-16 8:48 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-16 11:11 ` Harald Dunkel [this message]
2004-02-16 14:13 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 14:22 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 19:01 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-18 21:58 ` Tony Breeds
[not found] <1pw4i-hM-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pLmG-4E7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pRLz-21o-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pRVi-2am-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pWi8-65a-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-16 23:28 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-17 6:09 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-17 16:02 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-17 16:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-17 19:49 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-11 19:54 Harald Dunkel
2004-02-15 2:38 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2004-02-15 9:58 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-17 7:41 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-18 1:28 ` Wakko Warner
2004-02-18 8:46 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-18 17:25 ` Wakko Warner
2004-02-19 1:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4030A561.8070701@t-online.de \
--to=harald.dunkel@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@kth.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox