From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265111AbUBPLMe (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:12:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265501AbUBPLMd (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:12:33 -0500 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]:9130 "EHLO mailout02.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265111AbUBPLMc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:12:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4030A561.8070701@t-online.de> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:11:29 +0100 From: Harald Dunkel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040214 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question References: <1o903-5d8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <1pkw6-3BU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <1prnS-4x8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <402F8A00.8030501@uchicago.edu> <40306F65.8060702@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Seen: false X-ID: VsAJ3gZCYej9MmyNignHBgItD2vQyUT02xngFi+++nq2a23SLHJoYv Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Måns Rullgård wrote: > Harald Dunkel writes: > > > /proc/modules uses only _ so you could use ${module_name/-/_}. > Please check the archive: My original complaint was about the inconsistency between /proc/modules listing all modules with '_', and the module filenames using both '-' and '_'. For me it is not important which version is better. As a developer I have to assume that '_' and '-' are ambiguous in this context. This ambiguity is pretty strange for Unix, isn't it? Regards Harri