From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Walt H <waltabbyh@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc.
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:53:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403103A2.1040709@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402141016.51205.waltabbyh@comcast.net>
Walt H wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:32:31PM -0500, Timothy Miller wrote:
>
>
>>For writes, iozone found an upper bound of about 10megs/sec, which is
>>abysmal. Typically, I'd expect writes to be faster (on a single drive)
>>than reads, because once the write is sent, you can forget about it.
>>You don't have to wait around for something to come back, and that
>>latency for reads can hurt performance. The OS can also buffer writes
>>and reorder them in order to improve efficiency.
>
>
> I'm joining this thread rather late, so perhaps I missed something. What
> hardware is the test being ran on? I have an AMD MPX based setup which
> suffers from a chipset bug which effectively limits writes to ~25MB/sec to
> devices connected via the 768 southbridge. Maybe something similar with your
> hardware?
Athlon 2800+
Via KT400 chipset (ABIT KD7, I believe)
WD1200JB (Western Digital 120gb)
3ware 7000-2 as RAID1
Latest Red Hat 2.4.20-?? kernel
My wife's computer has the ABIT board with the KT333 and the same drive,
but not RAID. SiSoft SANDRA reports 39 megs/sec for writes to an NTFS
volume.
Right now, I'm thinking the bottleneck may be the 3ware.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-14 18:16 File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc Walt H
2004-02-16 17:53 ` Timothy Miller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-13 12:23 Daniel Blueman
2004-02-13 14:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-13 14:44 ` Daniel Blueman
2004-02-13 16:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-13 22:56 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-12 23:32 Timothy Miller
2004-02-13 5:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-02-13 19:19 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-13 22:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-02-13 23:14 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-13 19:30 ` Eric D. Mudama
2004-02-13 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-13 20:44 ` John Bradford
2004-02-13 22:45 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403103A2.1040709@techsource.com \
--to=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=waltabbyh@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox