From: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:06:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4033714A.FFFEBD6C@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m24qtpikmd.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com
Jan Rychter wrote:
> Jari> Do you mind doing a a quick grep:
>
> Jari> cd /path/to/your/kernel/source grep "Jari Ruusu"
> Jari> drivers/block/loop.c
>
> Jari> If you see my name there, your kerneli.org cryptoapi enabled
> Jari> kernel is running same loop code I wrote years ago. Those
> Jari> loop-jari-something patches that you find on the net, are just
> Jari> copies of old loop-AES code.
>
> No, it is not running this code. The code that works well for me is the
> external cryptoapi (as modules) with last update in Feb 2002.
Then you are running loop that fails in few seconds using my tests.
> How do you get a file-backed encrypted filesystem to work under Linux
> 2.4.24?
Writable file backed loops received death sentence when GFP_NOFS was
introduced to kernel, and they have been on death row since then. The best
way is to set up partition backed loop using loop-AES. Mainline loop is
still prone to deadlock, both file backed and device backed.
--
Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-18 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 15:33 Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.* Michal Kwolek
2004-02-11 18:41 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 2:35 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-15 14:51 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 16:38 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-16 0:26 ` James Morris
2004-02-18 14:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 12:22 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-17 14:09 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-17 19:14 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-18 14:06 ` Jari Ruusu [this message]
2004-02-18 21:40 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-19 13:34 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-11 22:54 ` bill davidsen
2004-02-15 17:34 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 18:42 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 19:36 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 19:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 20:24 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 22:13 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon Mike Christie
2004-02-16 0:04 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 1:04 ` Mike Christie
2004-02-16 1:29 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 3:02 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Rusty Russell
2004-02-16 13:27 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 16:42 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:48 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-16 1:44 ` dm-crypt using kthread " Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 1:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-16 2:07 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 3:03 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 3:22 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 4:05 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 4:14 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 10:15 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 9:54 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 22:18 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-03-01 22:51 ` Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 23:22 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-02-16 2:58 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 7:28 ` David Wagner
2004-02-16 10:11 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-18 14:15 ` dm-crypt using kthread Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 2:07 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Andrew Morton
2004-02-16 2:17 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 2:53 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 2:10 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 2:40 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 2:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 3:10 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:04 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 19:09 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4033714A.FFFEBD6C@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jan@rychter.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox