From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267456AbUBSB74 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:59:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267454AbUBSB74 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:59:56 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:52682 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267456AbUBSB7J (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:59:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4034185A.1020609@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:58:50 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Halasa CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: struct hdlc_device + embedded struct net_device disassosiation References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Hi, > > Your 2.6 network patchkits contained patches disassociating struct > net_device from struct hdlc_device in drivers/net/wan/hdlc_* > and in various hw WAN drivers. What is the status of this patch? > Is it still needed and while it was dropped as untested, should I > review/test it? It looks quite complete and reasonable I think. It was merged earlier today into 2.6.x mainline, and should appear in tonight 2.6.3-BK snapshot. Any additional testing and review would certainly be appreciated! Jeff