From: "Nick Warne" <nick@ukfsn.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.3 RT8139too NIC problems
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:17:32 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4034EFAC.21065.4E1A8B4@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040219171122.GA17199@linux-sh.org>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:47:08PM -0000, Nick Warne wrote:
> > >From my config file:
> >
> > # CONFIG_8139CP is not set
> > CONFIG_8139TOO=y
> > # CONFIG_8139TOO_PIO is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139TOO_8129 is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139_OLD_RX_RESET is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX= is not set
> >
> > No other NIC drivers are used.
> >
> > I am also stuck as to what the new RXBUF_IDX is for. It appears the
> > new build needs it, as I cannot remove.
> >
> So read the help entry in Kconfig. Before this change went in, pretty much
> everyone defaulted to a 32k receive ring size, which is also the current
> default. If you had used the default value of 2 instead of trying to hack
> around it, you might get better behavior from your driver..
Hi Paul,
My bad...
I did use the default 2... unfortunately that snippet I copied here
was what I tried to do to rebuild kernel with out it, but make just
adds the line back in CONFIG and asks what option I what.
So it is set to 2 as per the default.
So, corrected (and as the kernel was built):
# CONFIG_8139CP is not set
CONFIG_8139TOO=y
# CONFIG_8139TOO_PIO is not set
# CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER is not set
# CONFIG_8139TOO_8129 is not set
# CONFIG_8139_OLD_RX_RESET is not set
CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX=2
Nick
--
"I am not Spock", said Leonard Nimoy.
"And it is highly illogical of humans to assume so."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-19 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 16:47 2.6.3 RT8139too NIC problems Nick Warne
2004-02-19 17:11 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-19 17:17 ` Nick Warne [this message]
2004-02-19 22:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-20 16:42 ` Nick Warne
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-19 20:04 Nick Warne
2004-02-21 14:59 Nick Warne
[not found] ` <14539106.1077630890@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk>
2004-02-24 18:23 ` Nick Warne
2004-02-24 20:36 Nick Warne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4034EFAC.21065.4E1A8B4@localhost \
--to=nick@ukfsn.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox