From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267593AbUBTAKA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:10:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267594AbUBTAKA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:10:00 -0500 Received: from pacific.moreton.com.au ([203.143.235.130]:10765 "EHLO dorfl.internal.moreton.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267593AbUBTAJ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:09:58 -0500 Message-ID: <40355080.8090008@snapgear.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:10:40 +1000 From: Greg Ungerer Organization: SnapGear User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Weinehall CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.6.3-uc0 (MMU-less fixups) References: <40342BD5.9080105@snapgear.com> <20040219103900.GH17140@khan.acc.umu.se> <4034B2E5.1090505@snapgear.com> <20040219131317.GI17140@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20040219131317.GI17140@khan.acc.umu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, David Weinehall wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 10:58:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: >>David Weinehall wrote: >>>On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:21:57PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: >>> >>>>An update of the uClinux (MMU-less) fixups against 2.6.3. >>>>Nothing much new, just redone against 2.6.3. >>>> >>>>http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/uClinux-2.6.x/linux-2.6.3-uc0.patch.gz >>> >>>Any plans for a 2.6-version of the ARM-support? >> >>Yes. There is some code available now, although it is not complete >>and doesn't fully work yet. It really needs more cleaning up before >>it will be interresting or useful to anyone. > > Dang. I wish I still had some arm-hardware to play with (no, I'm not > gonna sacrifice my Tungsten E for uClinux-work...) You don't need real hardware :-) The gdb/ARMulator makes a fine target for development. Quicker and easier to develop with. Heres a good place to get started with it if interrested: http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/utilities/armulator/ > How's the status of the 2.0-port of uClinux, btw? Is it unintrusive > enough to be considered for a 2.0-merge? Hmm, probably not. It is no where near as clean as the 2.6 merge. It could be cleaned up, but no one seems to interrested in doing the work. Regards Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Dude EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com SnapGear -- a CyberGuard Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630 Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com