From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267548AbUBTFLG (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:11:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267541AbUBTFLF (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:11:05 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:43196 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267479AbUBTFLC (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:11:02 -0500 Message-ID: <403596D8.8020509@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:10:48 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Wagland CC: Linux SCSI mailing list , Linux kernel mailing list , akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, atulm@lsil.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] : Megaraid patch for 2.6 1/5 References: <1077242738.12567.76.camel@morsel.kungfoocoder.org> In-Reply-To: <1077242738.12567.76.camel@morsel.kungfoocoder.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patches 1-5 look OK to me. If you are attempting to follow LSI's megaraid (in 2.4 only, sigh), patch #4 may wind up causing you grief in the future. Hopefully Atul will pick it up, though :) Jeff