* [PATCH] [2.6] UFS2 Read Only Patch
@ 2004-02-18 9:24 Niraj Kumar
2004-02-18 9:44 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Niraj Kumar @ 2004-02-18 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: akpm
Andrew,
Please apply this patch .
They provide the bare minimum read-only support for
ufs2 variant (from FreeBSD 5.x ) of the UFS filesystem .
The patch for 2.6.3 is here :
http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/2.6.3/ufs2-read-only-p1.txt
http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/2.6.3/ufs2-read-only-p2.txt
Thanks
Niraj
>Hi ,
>
>I am trying to produce some patches to be able to
>support UFS2 (of FreeBSD 5.x ) filesystem.
>
>The work-in-progress patches are available from
>http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/p1.txt
> http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/p2.txt
>
>Currently , these provides the bare minimum ufs2
>support and that also for Read-Only .
>
>This is just a snapshot so several things simply may not work.
>But atleast I was able to mount my ufs2 partition
>(from a FreeBSD 5.2 install ) and read files.
>
>Some testing will be good on them, though.
>
>Niraj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [2.6] UFS2 Read Only Patch
2004-02-18 9:24 [PATCH] [2.6] UFS2 Read Only Patch Niraj Kumar
@ 2004-02-18 9:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 10:37 ` Niraj Kumar
2004-02-20 6:35 ` Niraj Kumar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-02-18 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Niraj Kumar; +Cc: linux-kernel
Niraj Kumar <niraj17@iitbombay.org> wrote:
>
> lease apply this patch .
> They provide the bare minimum read-only support for
> ufs2 variant (from FreeBSD 5.x ) of the UFS filesystem .
>
> The patch for 2.6.3 is here :
> http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/2.6.3/ufs2-read-only-p1.txt
> http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/2.6.3/ufs2-read-only-p2.txt
ooh, I see you have a mkfs.ufs there. Does it support UFS1 as well?
Does current UFS support little-endian machines? If so, has this code been
tested on a little-endian host? The code _looks_ OK, but one does need to
test...
Has the patched filesystem been regression tested against a UFS1 filesystem?
The patches which you have there are a bit of a disaster coding-style wise.
- Use hard tabs everywhere, not eight-spaces.
- No space before terminating semicolons
-
+ if ( (flags & UFS_TYPE_MASK) == UFS_TYPE_UFS2)
+ {
+ uspi->s_u2_size = fs64_to_cpu(sb, usb->fs_u11.fs_u2.fs_size);
should be
if ((flags & UFS_TYPE_MASK) == UFS_TYPE_UFS2) {
etcetera. See Documentation/CodingStyle.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] [2.6] UFS2 Read Only Patch
2004-02-18 9:44 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2004-02-18 10:37 ` Niraj Kumar
2004-02-20 6:35 ` Niraj Kumar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Niraj Kumar @ 2004-02-18 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
Andrew,
Thanks for the comments.
>> The patch for 2.6.3 is here :
>> http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/2.6.3/ufs2-read-only-p1.txt
>> http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/ufs2/2.6.3/ufs2-read-only-p2.txt
>>
>>
>
>ooh, I see you have a mkfs.ufs there. Does it support UFS1 as well?
>
Yeah , it does support UFS1 as well ....
>Does current UFS support little-endian machines? If so, has this code been
>tested on a little-endian host? The code _looks_ OK, but one does need to
>test...
>
This patch has been somewhat tested on my "Pentium 4" machine (running
RHEL 3).
Other than that , 1-2 persons on freebsd list has also tried this.
>Has the patched filesystem been regression tested against a UFS1 filesystem?
>
Only some most basic (mount , read ) functionality has been cheked to be
working.
>
>
>The patches which you have there are a bit of a disaster coding-style wise.
>
>- Use hard tabs everywhere, not eight-spaces.
>
>- No space before terminating semicolons
>
>-
>
>+ if ( (flags & UFS_TYPE_MASK) == UFS_TYPE_UFS2)
>+ {
>+ uspi->s_u2_size = fs64_to_cpu(sb, usb->fs_u11.fs_u2.fs_size);
>
> should be
>
> if ((flags & UFS_TYPE_MASK) == UFS_TYPE_UFS2) {
>
> etcetera. See Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
Well .... I will prepare a modifed patch and send that again .
>Thanks.
>
All-in-all , the problem is that this
was not getting enough testing so I thought that unless it is included
in , say mm series, it will not get tested. That's why I send it to you .
But anyway , wait for the modifed version (which will take care of
Documentation/CodingStyle) .
Niraj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] [2.6] UFS2 Read Only Patch
2004-02-18 9:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 10:37 ` Niraj Kumar
@ 2004-02-20 6:35 ` Niraj Kumar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Niraj Kumar @ 2004-02-20 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
Andrew,
I have updated the patch files.
Let me know if you have any more comments.
Niraj
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Niraj Kumar <niraj17@iitbombay.org> wrote:
>
>
>The patches which you have there are a bit of a disaster coding-style wise.
>
>- Use hard tabs everywhere, not eight-spaces.
>
>- No space before terminating semicolons
>
>-
>
>+ if ( (flags & UFS_TYPE_MASK) == UFS_TYPE_UFS2)
>+ {
>+ uspi->s_u2_size = fs64_to_cpu(sb, usb->fs_u11.fs_u2.fs_size);
>
> should be
>
> if ((flags & UFS_TYPE_MASK) == UFS_TYPE_UFS2) {
>
> etcetera. See Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-20 6:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-18 9:24 [PATCH] [2.6] UFS2 Read Only Patch Niraj Kumar
2004-02-18 9:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 10:37 ` Niraj Kumar
2004-02-20 6:35 ` Niraj Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox