From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261171AbUBTMMg (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:12:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261163AbUBTMMg (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:12:36 -0500 Received: from colossus.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.160.73]:7578 "EHLO colossus.systems.pipex.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261172AbUBTMMc (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:12:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4035F9AE.6060001@emergence.uk.net> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:12:30 +0000 From: Jonathan Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Double fb_console_init call during do_initcalls Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org fb_console_init gets called twice during do_initcalls. Should it be called from vty_init or as its own initcall? If it should be its own initcall then can it be moved up the list to occur sooner? I think it looks better if the fb kicks in as early as possible. [] take_over_console+0x14a/0x1c9 [] fb_console_init+0x2b/0x59 [] vty_init+0xc9/0xd3 [] tty_init+0x234/0x23c [] do_initcalls+0x32/0x80 [] init+0x2f/0x109 [] init+0x0/0x109 [] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 [] take_over_console+0x14a/0x1c9 [] fb_console_init+0x2b/0x59 [] do_initcalls+0x32/0x80 [] init+0x2f/0x109 [] init+0x0/0x109 [] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 Jonathan Brown http://emergence.uk.net/