From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261651AbUBVCwO (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:52:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261650AbUBVCwO (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:52:14 -0500 Received: from mail-05.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.37]:54670 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261655AbUBVCv4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:51:56 -0500 Message-ID: <40381819.7000606@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:46:49 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Mike Fedyk , William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wedgwood Subject: Re: Large slab cache in 2.6.1 References: <4037FCDA.4060501@matchmail.com> <4038014E.5070600@matchmail.com> <20040222012033.GC703@holomorphy.com> <40380DE2.4030702@matchmail.com> <403814E5.3070106@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <403814E5.3070106@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > I have an idea it might be worthwhile to try using inactive list > scanning as an input to slab pressure... > Err that is what it does, of course. My idea was the other way round - use active list scanning as input. So no, that probably won't help. Only one way to find out though. Patch against 2.6.3-mm2.