From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262244AbUBXNWZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:22:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262253AbUBXNWZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:22:25 -0500 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:49937 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262244AbUBXNWY (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:22:24 -0500 Message-ID: <403B5257.2030305@techsource.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:32:07 -0500 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Heil CC: Thomas Zehetbauer , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64 References: <16435.14044.182718.134404@alkaid.it.uu.se> <20040222025957.GA31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <1077584461.8414.164.camel@hostmaster.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John Heil wrote: > > > I'll second that. > > For whatever it's worth I replaced all my intel business boxes w AMD > w the advent of the K7/Athlon's and haven't looked back since, > including SMP. Next up for us will be dual Opteron. I cannot see > ever returning to Intel. > This is not a comment in favor of Intel... just a lament... Things may have changed, but when I last built a Linux box (Athlon XP 2800+), I was not able to find a motherboard for recent AMD processors with 64bit/66mhz PCI slots. If I'd needed that, I would have had to go with Intel.