From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262288AbUBXPuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:50:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262289AbUBXPuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:50:44 -0500 Received: from mail5.iserv.net ([204.177.184.155]:27858 "EHLO mail5.iserv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262288AbUBXPuY (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:50:24 -0500 Message-ID: <403B72C2.1010705@didntduck.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:50:26 -0500 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Soboroff CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why are 2.6 modules so huge? References: <9cfptc4lckg.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> In-Reply-To: <9cfptc4lckg.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Soboroff wrote: > Can anyone help me understand why 2.6-series kernel modules are so > huge? > > $ cd /lib/modules > $ ls -l */kernel/fs/vfat > 2.4.20-18.8bigmem/kernel/fs/vfat: > total 20 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17678 May 29 2003 vfat.o > > 2.4.23-xfs/kernel/fs/vfat: > total 20 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17614 Dec 3 18:04 vfat.o > > 2.6.0/kernel/fs/vfat: > total 288 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 288738 Feb 11 16:47 vfat.ko > > 2.6.3/kernel/fs/vfat: > total 288 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 289086 Feb 24 10:09 vfat.ko > > Ian > You probably have debugging config options enabled (ie CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO). -- Brian Gerst