From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262429AbUBXUD5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:03:57 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262430AbUBXUD4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:03:56 -0500
Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net ([64.164.98.8]:16540 "EHLO
	mta7.pltn13.pbi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262429AbUBXUDy
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:03:54 -0500
Message-ID: <403BAE08.3090400@matchmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:03:20 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Heil <kerndev@sc-software.com>
CC: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
       Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>,
       Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz@hostmaster.org>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402171739020.2686@home.osdl.org> <16435.14044.182718.134404@alkaid.it.uu.se> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402180744440.2686@home.osdl.org> <20040222025957.GA31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402211907100.3301@ppc970.osdl.org> <1077584461.8414.164.camel@hostmaster.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402231707220.13525@scsoftware.sc-software.com> <403B5257.2030305@techsource.com> <20040224194354.GA13816@bitwizard.nl> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402241147550.13525@scsoftware.sc-software.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402241147550.13525@scsoftware.sc-software.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

John Heil wrote:
> And so far, I've found Tyan to be the slightly more reliable of the two.

How so?  What kind of failures did you have with the ASUS board?