From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Darren Williams <dsw@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.3 Slab corruption: errors are triggered when memory exceeds 2.5GB (correction)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:21:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403C3F04.20601@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040225005804.GE18070@cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
Darren Williams wrote:
>Hi Manfred
>
>I have updated to the latest bk and new output can be found at:
>http://quasar.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dsw/public-files/lemon-debug/
>kern-log-bk
>
>Also I am quite confident that it is not a hardware problem.
>
>I took a look at alloc_skb(..) and there is a reference to
>an atomic_t token with this being the most suspect
>
>150> atomic_set(&(skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref), 1);
>
>
I don't think so:
The allocation that generates the error is skb->head: The cache name is
"size-2048", thus the allocation is a kmalloc(1000-2000, probably 1536
for one eth frame). The skb itself is allocated from the skbuff_head_cache.
I don't see a pattern in the virtual addresses:
start=e000000101ee09a0, len=2048
start=e000000101ee09a0, len=2048
start=e000000101ee11b8, len=2048
start=e000000101ee19d0, len=2048
start=e000000101ee3218, len=2048
start=e00000017eed1b90, len=2048
start=e00000017eed23a8, len=2048
start=e00000017eed2bc0, len=2048
start=e00000017eed4308, len=2048
start=e00000017eed5338, len=2048
start=e00000017eed5338, len=2048
start=e00000017eed5b50, len=2048
start=e00000017eed5b50, len=2048
start=e00000017eed6b80, len=2048
start=e00000017eed82c8, len=2048
start=e00000017eedc288, len=2048
start=e00000017eedcaa0, len=2048
start=e00000017eeddad0, len=2048
start=e00000017eede2e8, len=2048
start=e00000017eedeb00, len=2048
start=e00000017ef60a60, len=2048
start=e00000017ef61a90, len=2048
start=e00000017ef622a8, len=2048
start=e00000017ef62ac0, len=2048
start=e00000017ef632d8, len=2048
start=e00000017ef65a50, len=2048
start=e00000017ef65a50, len=2048
start=e00000017ef65a50, len=2048
start=e00000017ef66a80, len=2048
That virtually rules out a bad memory chip.
But the corrupted byte is always at offset 0x620 into the allocation:
Slab corruption: start=e00000017ef65a50, len=2048
620: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
--
Slab corruption: start=e000000101ee19d0, len=2048
620: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
--
Slab corruption: start=e000000101ee3218, len=2048
620: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
--
Slab corruption: start=e00000017ef66a80, len=2048
620: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
--
Slab corruption: start=e000000101ee11b8, len=2048
620: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
0x620 (1568) is behind the end of the actual eth frame. Who could modify
that?
Darren, which nic do you use? Could you try what happens if you reduce
the MTU?
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-24 6:38 [BUG] 2.6.3 Slab corruption: errors are triggered when memory exceeds 2.5GB (correction) Manfred Spraul
2004-02-24 6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-24 8:45 ` Darren Williams
2004-02-24 17:40 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-02-25 0:58 ` Darren Williams
2004-02-25 1:05 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-25 6:21 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2004-02-25 7:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-25 7:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 8:24 ` Darren Williams
2004-02-25 17:18 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-02-26 0:30 ` Darren Williams
2004-02-25 8:55 ` Darren Williams
2004-02-25 10:18 ` Peter Chubb
2004-02-25 6:17 ` Darren Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 0:22 [BUG] 2.6.3 Slab corruption: errors are triggered when memory exceeds 2GB Darren Williams
2004-02-24 1:14 ` [BUG] 2.6.3 Slab corruption: errors are triggered when memory exceeds 2.5GB (correction) Darren Williams
2004-02-26 1:09 ` Darren Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403C3F04.20601@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dsw@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox