From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262656AbUBYH2r (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:28:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262657AbUBYH2r (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:28:47 -0500 Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18]:9185 "EHLO mailout04.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262656AbUBYH2o (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:28:44 -0500 Message-ID: <403C4E98.6010107@t-online.de> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:28:24 +0100 From: Harald Dunkel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why are 2.6 modules so huge? References: <9cfptc4lckg.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Seen: false X-ID: bLdVzTZBYeAPsfVbV1i7iDw1JP3c9TXVeJhD2byv6sA7SodP9I3Gw7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Måns Rullgård wrote: > > My 2.6.3 vfat.ko is 15365 bytes. Maybe you enabled kernel debugging > symbols. > % ll /lib/modules/2.6.3/kernel/fs/vfat/ total 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14232 Feb 19 07:43 vfat.ko Assuming that you are on i686: A size difference of 1 KByte (about 7%) is remarkable. Which gcc did you use for building 2.6.3? I am on Debian (Sid). Gcc is 3.3.3, which was released a few days ago. Regards Harri