From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261467AbUBYRQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:16:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261418AbUBYRQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:16:14 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([63.209.29.3]:7633 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261467AbUBYRQK (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:16:10 -0500 Message-ID: <403CD852.1060200@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:16:02 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040105 X-Accept-Language: en, sv, es, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timothy Miller CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64 References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173EA2718@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> <403CCBE0.7050100@techsource.com> <403CD900.6080003@techsource.com> In-Reply-To: <403CD900.6080003@techsource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Timothy Miller wrote: > > I think we were talking about absolute branches when referring to "near > branches". For absolute branches, having a 32-bit address restricts you > to the lower 4G of the address space. > You're talking about *indirect* near branches? Those are the only absolute near branches which exist... -hpa