From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261620AbUBYXRN (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:17:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261621AbUBYXQ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:16:26 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:16074 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261768AbUBYXGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:06:52 -0500 Message-ID: <403D2A7E.7030504@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:06:38 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Richard CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Feldman, Scott" Subject: Re: e1000 only works in 2.6.3 with UP kernel ? References: <403CE4E4.9010608@axion.net> In-Reply-To: <403CE4E4.9010608@axion.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patrick Richard wrote: > Hi, > > I have been struggling to get the e1000 driver working _at all_ in > 2.6.3. It works fine under 2.4.xx (same machine). This is all on an ASUS > P4C800-E deluxe, using onboard e1000 and P4 with HT enabled. Does 2.6.3-bk7 change things? Jeff