public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Grigor Gatchev <grigor@zadnik.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:23:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <403E47B4.8080507@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402261303490.21036-100000@lugburz.zadnik.org>

Grigor Gatchev wrote:
> I don't see the need for starting a project.
> 
> First, if unsuccssful, no reason to start it. And if successful, it will
> fork the kernel development, with all negative implications following.
> I see no sense in doing what eventually will damage the kernel
> development, instead of improving it.

If you start a project, that doesn't mean the "fork" is bad as long as 
the intention is to integrate the work back into the base.

What you are asking for is for people to add to their list of things to 
code.  You should be adding code yourself.

> Second, the development of the kernel is already going this way,
> regardless of our discussion. This is its logic. You can see no use of the
> discussion, but you cannot see no use in following the kernel development
> logic.

Linux has many groups of people pushing and pulling it in numerous 
directions.  Very rarely does a direction succeed if the people who want 
that specific direction don't submit code.

Useful discussion would be asking for implementation suggestions to get 
to your goal.  Oh wait, I think there are already some of those in this 
thread.

Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-26 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-24 20:05 A Layered Kernel: Proposal Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25  9:08   ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 12:52     ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25 13:23       ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 15:08         ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 15:42           ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 16:01             ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-25 19:25               ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-25 19:46                 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 23:40                   ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26  0:55                     ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 15:43                       ` Jesse Pollard
2004-02-26 17:12                         ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-27  9:45                           ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 11:03                     ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26  5:59                   ` jw schultz
2004-02-29 12:32                   ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-29 14:48                     ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-01  6:07                       ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 18:51                     ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08  3:11                       ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 12:23                         ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08 17:39                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-03-08 20:41                             ` viro
2004-03-09 19:12                             ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-09 21:03                               ` Timothy Miller
2004-03-09 23:24                               ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 18:41                           ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 21:33                           ` Paul Jackson
2004-02-25 14:44       ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 10:03   ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 19:58     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 21:59       ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 22:22         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 11:46           ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 12:17             ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-26 16:37               ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 18:12                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-26 19:23             ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-02-27 11:18               ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-27 18:05                 ` Tim Hockin
2004-02-27 18:34                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-27 18:27                 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-28  0:26                 ` Rik van Riel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 20:28 Carlos Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=403E47B4.8080507@matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=grigor@zadnik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox