From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263086AbUB0SS1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:18:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262906AbUB0SS1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:18:27 -0500 Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.56]:26021 "EHLO mtaw6.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263089AbUB0SRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:17:19 -0500 Message-ID: <403F898A.2000801@matchmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:16:42 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare CC: Greg KH , "J.A. Magallon" , "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com Subject: Re: 2.6.3-mm4 References: <20040225185536.57b56716.akpm@osdl.org> <403E82D8.3030209@gmx.de> <20040225185536.57b56716.akpm@osdl.org> <20040227001115.GA2627@werewolf.able.es> <20040227004602.GB15075@kroah.com> <1077870909.403f013dd04b6@imp.gcu.info> In-Reply-To: <1077870909.403f013dd04b6@imp.gcu.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jean Delvare wrote: > Quoting Greg KH : > > >>Anyway, I think all you need to do is get the cvs tree of the >>lmsensors package. Sensors people, the needed changes are commited >>into the tree, right? > > > No. The changes are waiting in my local repository, ready to be applied. > I didn't want to apply them because we were supposed to release > lm_sensors 2.8.5 (for Linux 2.6.3 users) and the sysfs names change > wouldn't belong there. > > The libsensors patches are available on my personal server here: > http://jdelvare.net1.nerim.net/sensors/ > Apply both patches in order and you'll get a 2.6.3-mm4-compliant > library. > > I will apply the libsensors changes to the CVS repository as soon as the > kernel modules changes are accepted into Linus' tree. If we did not > release a new version since there, I'll take a CVS snapshot right > before so that Linux 2.6.3 users have a usable version available (but > my preference strongly goes to releasing 2.8.5 instead). You have to be kidding me. Are you saying that with your patches to libsensors it won't support 2.6.3 style sensor sysfs names?