Re: IB/core: Fine-tuning for ib_is_udata_cleared()

SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-21T20:15:58Z

>>> Don't introduce a defect in patch 1 and correct
>>> that introduced defect in patch 2.
>> Which detail do you not like here?
>
> See above.

This feedback is not clearer.

I find that the two update steps should work in principle,
shouldn't they?

I guess that we have got different preferences for the shown
patch granularity. Another update variant can follow a bit later
with the changes squashed together.

Regards,
Markus