Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection

SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-14T12:45:29Z

>> Can you accept the proposed changes around the affected memory allocations?
>
> Just leave it as-is if there is no reason.

I suggest to make the implementation of the function "mgc_process_recover_log"
a bit more efficient.

>> Do you prefer to stash any changes together for a bigger update step?
>
> Yes. Patches 5 and 6 would be easier to review if they were folded into
> one patch.

I do not like patch squashing for my update suggestions here.

Regards,
Markus