From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Dong Aisheng" <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Yassine Oudjana" <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
"Laura Nao" <laura.nao@collabora.com>,
"Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>,
"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@chromium.org>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] clk: Respect CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE during recalc
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4040610.5fSG56mABF@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ed19fb1-258f-44c4-b816-73c0d7d28a6e@sirena.org.uk>
On Wednesday, 28 January 2026 16:21:47 Central European Standard Time Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
>
> > This is for TQMa8MPxL/MBa8MPxL:
>
> > [ 1.452788] __clk_core_init: enabling parent audio_pll1_out for clkout1_sel
> > [ 1.457677] __clk_core_init: disabling parent audio_pll1_out for clkout1_sel
> > [ 1.464270] __clk_core_init: enabling parent audio_pll1_out for clkout2_sel
> > [ 1.471760] __clk_core_init: disabling parent audio_pll1_out for clkout2_sel
> > [ 1.478360] __clk_core_init: enabling parent sys_pll2_500m for arm_a53_div
> > [ 1.485259] __clk_core_init: disabling parent sys_pll2_500m for arm_a53_div
>
> As expected same result on i.MX8MP-EVK.
>
This one puzzles me a little. arm_a53_div is neither marked critical
nor is its parent. If arm_a53_div is required for the system to function,
then I'd have expected at least it to be marked as critical, allowing us
to do the workaround in init I proposed as an alternate solution for the
stm32mp1 in my other reply.
Also, after reading the code some more, I think that alternate solution
has a simpler implementation: move the parent disable to after the
if (core->flags & CLK_IS_CRITICAL) {
check in __clk_core_init.
One explanation is that some other critical clock hangs off sys_pll2_500m,
but we're spoiled for choice here. I can't think of a simple fix right now
that I feel confident in.
Every IMX8MP composite clock that isn't critical seems to set
IMX_COMPOSITE_CLK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, which includes CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE,
which seems like a pretty weird choice to make when you then rely on
the parent not getting touched during __clk_core_init.
I will try to get an RFC fix out tonight (CET). I think STM32MP1 is
falling over because I messed up, and i.MX8MP is falling over due to
a combination of me messing up and its clock driver messing up.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 20:47 [PATCH v3 0/5] MediaTek PLL Refactors and Fixes Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-10 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] clk: Respect CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE during recalc Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-16 20:52 ` Brian Masney
2025-10-17 12:21 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-20 19:36 ` Brian Masney
2026-01-27 17:01 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-27 17:25 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-27 18:18 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-27 23:14 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-28 14:09 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-28 14:47 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-28 14:55 ` Alexander Stein
2026-01-28 15:21 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-28 16:31 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2026-01-28 17:08 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-28 16:04 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-28 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2026-01-28 19:59 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-02-02 16:54 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-10 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] clk: mediatek: Refactor pll registration to pass device Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-10 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: mediatek: Pass device to clk_hw_register for PLLs Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-10 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] clk: mediatek: Refactor pllfh registration to pass device Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-10-10 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] clk: mediatek: Add mfg_eb as parent to mt8196 mfgpll clocks Nicolas Frattaroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4040610.5fSG56mABF@workhorse \
--to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=laura.nao@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox