From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261336AbUCAPiw (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:38:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261339AbUCAPiw (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:38:52 -0500 Received: from snota.svorka.net ([194.19.72.11]:31365 "HELO snota.svorka.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261336AbUCAPiu (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:38:50 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jcb@svorka.no via snota X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:1(194.19.72.100):. Processed in 0.013286 secs) Message-ID: <4043590A.80200@svorka.no> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:38:50 +0100 From: Jo Christian Buvarp User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcelo Tosatti CC: Enrico Demarin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Ibm Serveraid Problem with 2.4.25 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wee :) That was it :) Everything looks fine now :) Great Work :) I did the -R against linux-2.4.25 :) -------------------------------------------------------------- Med vennlig hilsen/Yours sincerely Jo Christian Buvarp Svorka Aksess Notice: This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail is received by others than the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Jo Christian Buvarp wrote: > > > >>Okay :) >>I've done some tests now, in the following order: >>2.4.24-pre3 -> Same problem as before >>2.4.24-pre2 -> Same problem as before >>2.4.24-pre1 -> Same problem as before >> >>So it looks like the problematic change was added during 2.4.24-pre1 >> >>To be sure i tested with 2.4.23, and it didn't show anything unusal :) >> >> > >Hi fellows, > >So it seems the problematic change was added -pre1. Thanks for tracking >that down Jo! > >I suspect the problem is the attached "read last page of file" >modification done by Chuck Lever. > >Can you guys please apply it with -R to revert and test again? > >Thank you so much for your help in this!!! > >