From: Jaco Kroon <jkroon@cs.up.ac.za>
To: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 08:52:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40442F2B.9090704@cs.up.ac.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F38CF74@otce2k03.adaptec.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4298 bytes --]
Eek, that does not bear good. Somebody else mailed me this patch, so
would you mind sending me your orriginal patch for comparison?
And I assume that the scsi_unregister call should in fact not be in
there? If I understand it correctly there is either some function that
first calls adpt_release (from the address given in the info struct) and
then scsi_unregister, or scsi_unregister itself calls us.
Btw, none of this code was yet incorporated into the 2.6.3 kernel which
is why I started looking around for patches and actually looking at
making the changes myself. Btw, I also note that a couple of free's has
moved around - this gives me the idea that either a memory corruption
bug has been fixed (which leaves at least two of our machines in danger
of crashing) or a memory leak has been introduced. Or is it simply that
memory handling has been optimized a bit?
Jaco
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
>My code fragment has (original multiversion and version in 2.4.24):
>
>/*
> * scsi_unregister will be called AFTER we return.
> */
>static int adpt_release(struct Scsi_Host *host)
>{
> adpt_hba* pHba = (adpt_hba*) host->hostdata[0];
>// adpt_i2o_quiesce_hba(pHba);
> adpt_i2o_delete_hba(pHba);
> return 0;
>}
>
>So I am unsure as to how *that* (the scsi_unregister call) got in there
>in the 2.6.3 stream. adpt_i2o_queisce was commented out in version 2.4.5
>of the driver (Prior to the `historical documents' and at least the
>in-box driver for RH7.3). It was not part of the 2.6.2 tree I based my
>patch on and not part of the submitted 2.6 patch for the dpt_i2o driver.
>
>adpt_i2o_quiesce tells the adapter to stop all activity, including
>builds, and is a blocking command with a 4 minute timeout.
>
>Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Lang [mailto:david.lang@digitalinsight.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:24 AM
>To: Salyzyn, Mark; Jaco Kroon
>Cc: Adrian Bunk; Linux Kernel Mailing List
>Subject: Re: 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile
>
>Mark, do you have any comments on this?
>
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
>
>
>>Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 01:28:14 -0800
>>From: Jaco Kroon <jkroon@cs.up.ac.za>
>>To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
>>Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
>> Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>>Subject: Re: 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile
>>
>>David Lang wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I received a post from Mark Salyzyn with a new driver that does
>>>
>>>
>>compile,
>>
>>
>>>he said that he has submitted the patches (I didn't get a chance to
>>>
>>>
>try
>
>
>>>the new kernel yet, I expect to do that shortly and will report any
>>>problems)
>>>
>>>D
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Somebody just mailed me a patch too, but I found the following
>>discrepancy:
>>
>>/*
>> * scsi_unregister will be called AFTER we return.
>> */
>>static int adpt_release(struct Scsi_Host *host)
>>{
>> adpt_hba* pHba = (adpt_hba*) host->hostdata[0];
>>// adpt_i2o_quiesce_hba(pHba);
>> adpt_i2o_delete_hba(pHba);
>> scsi_unregister(host);
>> return 0;
>>}
>>
>>This is used to release the host, now read the comment, and then the
>>line just before the return. This line was added by the patch, which
>>also commented out the quiesce line. Is it possible to get any
>>confirmation on how this is supposed to function?
>>
>>Jaco
>>
>>===========================================
>>This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer. Please refer
>>to www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ for full
>>details.
>>Hierdie boodskap en aanhangsels is aan 'n vrywaringsklousule
>>
>>
>onderhewig.
>
>
>>Volledige besonderhede is by
>>www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ beskikbaar.
>>===========================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
That that is is that that is not is not.
===========================================
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer. Please refer to www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ for full details.
Hierdie boodskap en aanhangsels is aan 'n vrywaringsklousule onderhewig. Volledige besonderhede is by www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ beskikbaar.
===========================================
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3174 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-02 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-26 14:56 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile Salyzyn, Mark
2004-03-02 6:52 ` Jaco Kroon [this message]
[not found] <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F38D76F@otce2k03.adaptec.com>
2004-03-16 14:20 ` Jaco Kroon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-20 21:26 dm-crypt, new IV and standards James Morris
2004-02-20 21:52 ` 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile David Lang
2004-02-25 16:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-02-26 8:02 ` Jaco Kroon
2004-02-26 8:08 ` David Lang
2004-02-26 9:28 ` Jaco Kroon
2004-02-26 10:24 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40442F2B.9090704@cs.up.ac.za \
--to=jkroon@cs.up.ac.za \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox