From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part3 (3/3)
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 18:16:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40469194.5080506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040304005542.GZ4922@dualathlon.random>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> This is just like the kernel patches people proposes when they get
> vmalloc LDT allocation failure, because they run with the i686 glibc
> instead of the only possibly supported i586 configuration. It makes no
> sense to hide a glibc inefficiency
You apparently still haven't gotten any clue since your whining the last
time around. Absolute addresses are a fatal mistake.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFARpGU2ijCOnn/RHQRAhs3AJ0XEZ5VGb40VAIPuO4negyo7cx/WwCbBrN6
EFZ7UnY7W/it0sUiq6Dodeg=
=KSMr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-04 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-04 0:11 [RFC][PATCH] vsyscall-gtod_B3 (0/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:12 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part1 (1/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:13 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part2 (2/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part3 (3/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 2:16 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2004-03-04 2:43 ` john stultz
2004-03-04 3:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 8:09 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-04 19:02 ` john stultz
2004-03-04 2:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 2:54 ` john stultz
2004-03-04 3:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 8:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-04 16:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 8:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-04 8:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-04 17:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 0:15 ` [RFC] vsyscall-gtod_test_B3.tar.gz john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40469194.5080506@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox