* nicksched v30
@ 2004-03-05 6:38 Nick Piggin
2004-03-05 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2004-03-05 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Jason Cox, Autar022
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2.
Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler
before using this one etc etc.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 6:38 nicksched v30 Nick Piggin
@ 2004-03-05 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-05 11:09 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-05 12:16 ` Markus Hästbacka
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Prakash K. Cheemplavam @ 2004-03-05 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jason Cox, Autar022
Nick Piggin wrote:
> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
>
> Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2.
> Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
> Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler
> before using this one etc etc.
So far i noticed:
with default scheduler:
When I run emerge sync (I am on gentoo) and finally the cache on disk
gets updated (very heavy disk activity), default scheduler (in
conjunction with cfq, haven' tried other) causes a schmall pause of 1-2
seconds when I use my browser, ie mouse cursor is ok, but I cannot
scroll for that time.
your scheduler: I tried it with the "love-sources", so maybe that patch
"steel300" incorporated was already a bit outdated, but I dunno. It had
the same version as above. When I click on a link in thunderbird and it
opens up in firefox (is started and just a new tab is created) the
mouses stutters for a brief moment. This didn't happen with default
scheduler. I dunno if above sympton happens with yours.
I haven't reniced X withy our patch. But I did it once and I didn't see
much of a difference. (I dunno if the mouse stutter went away then...)
bye,
Prakash
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
@ 2004-03-05 11:09 ` Nick Piggin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2004-03-05 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Prakash K. Cheemplavam; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jason Cox, Autar022
Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
>>
>> Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2.
>> Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
>> Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler
>> before using this one etc etc.
>
>
> So far i noticed:
>
> with default scheduler:
>
> When I run emerge sync (I am on gentoo) and finally the cache on disk
> gets updated (very heavy disk activity), default scheduler (in
> conjunction with cfq, haven' tried other) causes a schmall pause of
> 1-2 seconds when I use my browser, ie mouse cursor is ok, but I cannot
> scroll for that time.
>
Probably just reading stuff in.
> your scheduler: I tried it with the "love-sources", so maybe that
> patch "steel300" incorporated was already a bit outdated, but I dunno.
> It had the same version as above. When I click on a link in
> thunderbird and it opens up in firefox (is started and just a new tab
> is created) the mouses stutters for a brief moment. This didn't happen
> with default scheduler. I dunno if above sympton happens with yours.
>
> I haven't reniced X withy our patch. But I did it once and I didn't
> see much of a difference. (I dunno if the mouse stutter went away
> then...)
>
If you don't renice X then it doesn't get any special treatment and
interactivity is generally worse. It makes a very big difference here
when I run X at -15.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 6:38 nicksched v30 Nick Piggin
2004-03-05 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
@ 2004-03-05 12:16 ` Markus Hästbacka
2004-03-05 22:48 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-06 5:17 ` glennpj
2004-03-26 8:33 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
3 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Markus Hästbacka @ 2004-03-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: Kernel Mailinglist
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 08:38, Nick Piggin wrote:
> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
>
> Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2.
> Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
> Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler
> before using this one etc etc.
>
> Thanks
Same patch for 2.6.4-rc2? mm breaks up a few things for me :(
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 12:16 ` Markus Hästbacka
@ 2004-03-05 22:48 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2004-03-05 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Hästbacka; +Cc: Nick Piggin, Kernel Mailinglist
Markus Hästbacka wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 08:38, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
>>
>>Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2.
>>Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
>>Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler
>>before using this one etc etc.
>>
>>Thanks
>
> Same patch for 2.6.4-rc2? mm breaks up a few things for me :(
What does that mean?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 12:16 ` Markus Hästbacka
2004-03-05 22:48 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2004-03-06 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-06 11:39 ` Markus Hästbacka
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2004-03-06 3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Hästbacka; +Cc: Kernel Mailinglist
Markus Hästbacka wrote:
>On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 08:38, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
>>
>>Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2.
>>Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
>>Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler
>>before using this one etc etc.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>Same patch for 2.6.4-rc2? mm breaks up a few things for me :(
>
>
Unfortunately not. The scheduler in -mm is different enough
that porting isn't straightfoward.
What does mm break for you?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-06 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
@ 2004-03-06 11:39 ` Markus Hästbacka
2004-03-07 0:43 ` Nick Piggin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Markus Hästbacka @ 2004-03-06 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin, akpm, mfedyk; +Cc: Kernel Mailinglist
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 05:41, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Unfortunately not. The scheduler in -mm is different enough
> that porting isn't straightfoward.
>
> What does mm break for you?
I don't know about the current, but one or two versions back when I
tested the last time it printed something about unknown key for the
whole dmesg and couldn't find /dev/hd{b,c}. After investigations the
hard-drives had changed place for some reason (Not swapped place, but
they were in a weird location, can't recall which).
I'll try the new one when I have time to boot this one.
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-06 11:39 ` Markus Hästbacka
@ 2004-03-07 0:43 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-08 10:21 ` Markus Hästbacka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2004-03-07 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Hästbacka; +Cc: akpm, mfedyk, Kernel Mailinglist
Markus Hästbacka wrote:
>On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 05:41, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>Unfortunately not. The scheduler in -mm is different enough
>>that porting isn't straightfoward.
>>
>>What does mm break for you?
>>
>I don't know about the current, but one or two versions back when I
>tested the last time it printed something about unknown key for the
>whole dmesg and couldn't find /dev/hd{b,c}. After investigations the
>hard-drives had changed place for some reason (Not swapped place, but
>they were in a weird location, can't recall which).
>
>I'll try the new one when I have time to boot this one.
>
>
That would be good. Most stuff in mm is slated to get into the
official tree sooner or later, so finding problems sooner is
obviously preferable. Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-07 0:43 ` Nick Piggin
@ 2004-03-08 10:21 ` Markus Hästbacka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Markus Hästbacka @ 2004-03-08 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: akpm, mfedyk, Kernel Mailinglist
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> That would be good. Most stuff in mm is slated to get into the
> official tree sooner or later, so finding problems sooner is
> obviously preferable. Thanks
>
I've tried it now, seems to work now, maybe there was some problems in
earlier versions, now they seem to be fixed.
And feedback of the scheduler:
The scheduler work as great as always, everything works better, a boost in
performance. Thanks again.
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 6:38 nicksched v30 Nick Piggin
2004-03-05 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-05 12:16 ` Markus Hästbacka
@ 2004-03-06 5:17 ` glennpj
2004-03-26 8:33 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
3 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: glennpj @ 2004-03-06 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:38:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v30.gz
>
> Applies to kernel 2.6.4-rc1-mm2. Run X at about nice -10 or -15.
> Please report interactivity problems with the default scheduler before
> using this one etc etc.
>
> Thanks
I noticed you took out the SMT code. Does that mean this version of
your scheduler is not useful for SMT machines or that the code is just
not needed?
--
Glenn Johnson
glennpj@charter.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: nicksched v30
2004-03-05 6:38 nicksched v30 Nick Piggin
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-06 5:17 ` glennpj
@ 2004-03-26 8:33 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-29 22:19 ` Arvind Autar
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Prakash K. Cheemplavam @ 2004-03-26 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jason Cox, Autar022
Hi Nick,
could do be so nice and do a rediff against current mm kernel? As this
kernel finally seems to solve the higher idle temp issue I was having, I
would like to try your scheduler once again.
bye,
Prakash
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: nicksched v30
@ 2004-03-30 19:55 n.v.t n.v.t
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: n.v.t n.v.t @ 2004-03-30 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi, i have been having compile troubles, namely with mmap and sysctl. Any
help would be aperciated.
Joe
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail en Messenger on the move
http://www.msn.nl/communicatie/smsdiensten/hotmailsmsv2/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-30 20:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-05 6:38 nicksched v30 Nick Piggin
2004-03-05 10:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-05 11:09 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-05 12:16 ` Markus Hästbacka
2004-03-05 22:48 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-06 11:39 ` Markus Hästbacka
2004-03-07 0:43 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-08 10:21 ` Markus Hästbacka
2004-03-06 5:17 ` glennpj
2004-03-26 8:33 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-29 22:19 ` Arvind Autar
2004-03-30 0:17 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 20:12 ` Arvind Autar
[not found] ` <b9a78ea2ef3cba17ff7976aa8e5f187d@stdbev.com>
2004-03-30 14:03 ` Arvind Autar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-30 19:55 n.v.t n.v.t
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox