public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Grigor Gatchev <grigor@serdica.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:24:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <404E5210.4040204@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403091953001.32687-100000@lugburz.zadnik.org>

Grigor Gatchev wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>Is my description of Linux's device model accurate?  Sure.  Is it
>>useful in terms of telling us what we ought to do in order to improve
>>our architecture?  Not really.  It's just a buzzword-compliant,
>>high-level description which is great for getting great grades from
>>clueless C.S. professors that are more in love with theory than
>>practice.  But that's about all it's good for.
> 
> 
> You mean that, for example, drawing house elements on paper, and tossing
> some numbers here and back is useless in deciding how to build a house,
> and only getting hands to the real bricks gives you whether this wall
> should be here, and whether that column is thick enough to survive through
> a quake?

You are saying you should build a house with walls.  They're asking for 
a schematic (function prototypes), not to build the house yourself (not 
to code it all yourself).

Oh yeah and what Timothy Miller said! :-D

Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-09 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-24 20:05 A Layered Kernel: Proposal Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25  9:08   ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 12:52     ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25 13:23       ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 15:08         ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 15:42           ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 16:01             ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-25 19:25               ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-25 19:46                 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 23:40                   ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26  0:55                     ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 15:43                       ` Jesse Pollard
2004-02-26 17:12                         ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-27  9:45                           ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 11:03                     ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26  5:59                   ` jw schultz
2004-02-29 12:32                   ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-29 14:48                     ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-01  6:07                       ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 18:51                     ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08  3:11                       ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 12:23                         ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08 17:39                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-03-08 20:41                             ` viro
2004-03-09 19:12                             ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-09 21:03                               ` Timothy Miller
2004-03-09 23:24                               ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-03-08 18:41                           ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 21:33                           ` Paul Jackson
2004-02-25 14:44       ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 10:03   ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 19:58     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 21:59       ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 22:22         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 11:46           ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 12:17             ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-26 16:37               ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 18:12                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-26 19:23             ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-27 11:18               ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-27 18:05                 ` Tim Hockin
2004-02-27 18:34                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-27 18:27                 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-28  0:26                 ` Rik van Riel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 20:28 Carlos Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=404E5210.4040204@matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=christer@weinigel.se \
    --cc=grigor@serdica.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox