From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:49:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404F7F54.1000105@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040120011734.GB6309@kroah.com
Looks like the MODULE_VERSION macro is now in the tree.
Greg, any status on the sysfs patch you mention below?
thanks,
Brian
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>>In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write:
>>
>>>Rusty,
>>> Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending.
>>
>>Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were
>>frozen.
>>
>>This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or
>>a work of obvious beauty and genius?
>
>
> Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this?
>
>
>>Doesn't put things in sysfs, but Greg was working on that for module
>>parameters... Greg?
>
>
> Oh yeah, I'll dig out that patch later this week. An older version has
> been sitting in my bk tree forever, need to update it with the last
> changes you sent me.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com>
2004-01-20 0:57 ` Question on MODULE_VERSION macro Rusty Russell
2004-01-20 1:17 ` Greg KH
2004-01-20 7:47 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-20 21:44 ` Brian King
2004-02-21 1:07 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-22 23:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-23 3:51 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-23 21:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-24 6:13 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-25 21:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-26 1:50 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-26 7:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-03-10 20:49 ` Brian King [this message]
2004-03-10 21:08 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404F7F54.1000105@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox