Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)

[Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@stesmi.com>]

David Ford wrote:

> I won't.  I didn't say anything against inability to preserve line 
> boundaries.  I was, and am, referring to linear text and letting the end 
> user reflow that text to suit his or her preferences.
> 
> viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> 
>> Kindly piss off.  My mail reading software uses vi(1) to compose the
>> reply and has enough sense to preserve the line boundaries.

You also don't have a clue what replying below is all about nor do you
respond to anything regarding quotes. How many times haven't we seen
stupid quotes like this :

 > blah blah long long line ..........................
end of last line > here is the second line that's quoted
end of second line......... > and here starts the third one.

If you haven't - lucky you. But don't try to push your
reply-above-and-don't-give-a-piss-about-others approach.

This list replies below and uses manually wrapped lines.

If you want to create your own linux kernel list with other
rules - be free to do so, but if you want to continue talking
on this one, follow the rules on it, don't try to push your own.

// Stefan