Re: 2.6.4-mm1

Andi Kleen
2004-03-12T03:14:54Z

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:04:50PM -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> As we can have more complex architectures in the future, the scheduler
> is flexible enough to represent various scheduling domains effectively,
> and yet keeps the common scheduler code simple.

I think for SMT alone it's too complex and for NUMA it doesn't do
the right thing for "modern NUMAs" (where NUMA factor is very low
and you have a small number of CPUs for each node).

-Andi