From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:58:18 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <405776058.29534.1393264698347.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140224123926.0a44f32e@gandalf.local.home>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas
> Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
> "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 12:39:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC)
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo
> > > Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas
> > > Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
> > > "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
> > > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new
> > > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > (keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site)
> >
> > > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable.
> >
> > Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable
> > ?
>
> The one that I replied to. I can't pull the module patch unless I get
> an ack from Rusty.
Do you mean the internal API semantic change you propose for tracepoints ?
If yes, then how do you consider this a fix worthy of being backported to
stable ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> >
> > This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in
> > a separate thread marked [PATCH].
>
> Yeah, I'll post it out soon enough.
>
> -- Steve
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 23:23 [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-11 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-12 4:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 5:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 3:24 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-13 21:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-14 3:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-14 0:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-16 23:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-20 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 23:09 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-21 4:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-21 8:10 ` Johannes Berg
2014-02-26 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-26 12:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 15:36 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2014-02-13 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 21:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-02-13 15:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-14 3:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 16:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 17:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2014-02-24 18:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 2:53 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-26 20:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 18:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 19:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 14:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-26 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=405776058.29534.1393264698347.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox