From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] barrier patch set
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:34:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <405B2127.8090705@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040319153554.GC2933@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Cosmetic stuff that will get ironed out. You can find the patches here:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/axboe/patches/v2.6/2.6.5-rc1-mm2/
>
> ide-barrier-2.6.5-rc1-mm2-1
> ide/core part
WRT ATA and flush-cache... before the IDE pieces of this patch are
merged, IMO it is a requirement that the entire flush-cache stuff gets a
review. ide_get_error_location() is one of the important pieces
(great!). Another important piece is to make sure that a drive's
flush-cache capability is correctly deduced and set up from the
identify-device. The steps look like
- check identify-device word 83, bits 12 (flush cache) and 13 (flush
cache ext)
- issue set-features command to get flush-cache into proper state
(enabled or disabled, as the user desires), if identify-device word 86
indicates it is not already in the state you seek.
- re-read identify [packet] device page from device, make sure
flush-cache[-ext] is enabled. A slacker could just make sure the
set-features command completed successfully, but to be 100% correct you
need to re-read the identify-device page. :/
NOTE 1: these steps are specific to the flush-cache command, and are
only vaguely related to write caching (which must be tested-for and
enabled separately). It is important to go through these steps
separately for write-caching and flush-cache[-ext].
Write-caching and flush-cache-command state should always be considered
separately, even though the two are often used together. I want to
avoid the LG cdrom debacle, where not properly checking for, and setting
up, flush-cache resulted in turning cdroms into bricks.
NOTE 2: Don't forget to check for 0x0000 or 0xffff in word 86, of
__only__ identify-packet-device. These special case meanings do not
appear for ATA devices, only ATAPI devices.
NOTE 3: flush-cache-ext should always be used on lba48 devices, even if
the request was inside the lba28 limit.
NOTE 4: flush-cache-ext does not exist on ATAPI devices.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-19 15:35 [PATCH] barrier patch set Jens Axboe
2004-03-19 16:30 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-03-19 18:16 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-19 18:44 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-03-20 9:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-19 16:34 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-03-19 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-19 23:01 ` Matthias Andree
2004-03-20 0:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 1:48 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-03-20 2:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 2:53 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-03-20 16:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 11:36 ` Matthias Andree
2004-03-20 16:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 23:36 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-03-21 1:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 18:52 ` Helge Hafting
2004-03-22 11:15 ` Matthias Andree
2004-03-19 23:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 0:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 0:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 0:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 1:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 9:58 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-20 10:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 10:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-20 10:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 16:30 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-21 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 10:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 15:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 0:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 9:53 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-20 16:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-20 16:32 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-20 17:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-20 17:10 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-20 20:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-21 9:43 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-30 16:04 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-30 19:19 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-30 21:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-30 22:13 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-31 14:03 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-31 14:27 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-31 18:28 ` Ric Wheeler
2004-03-30 22:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-30 22:36 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-03-30 22:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-30 22:41 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-03-30 22:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-30 22:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-31 14:08 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-31 14:21 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-31 21:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-31 22:09 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-31 21:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-19 16:48 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-03-19 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-22 11:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-22 11:10 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=405B2127.8090705@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox