public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Pearson <huiac@internode.on.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange ext3 corruption problem on 2.6.x
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:03:48 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <405FE85C.5000307@internode.on.net> (raw)

OK,

I've seen this one now, too; here's my datapoint:

First, under vanilla 2.6.3:

EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory 
#917711: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1182746341, rec_len=16861, 
name_len=185
Aborting journal on device dm-0.
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device dm-0): ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal
Remounting filesystem read-only
 


Then, under 2.6.4+skas3:
 

EXT3-fs error (device dm-3): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory 
#510327: directory entry across blocks - offset=0, inode=0, 
rec_len=5044, name_len=113
Aborting journal on device dm-3.
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device dm-3): ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal
Remounting filesystem read-only



I'm running ext3 over raid5;  In both cases, fsck spotted the aborted 
journal and checked the FS, which came up clean.

No other issues in many days of uptime, including kernel compiles, etc., 
so I'm reasonably confident of the RAM and hardware generally.

I wouldn't describe either volume as seeing heavy use - there's rarely 
more than one reader, and almost never more than one writer.

dm-3 has had no writes since last boot (it serves images to diskless 
clients, including NFS roots mounted ro); dm-0 had seen a few writes 
(it's a read-mostly FTP server containing mirrors of debian-security and 
a few other things, synced about once a month).

'directory #510327' on dm-3 is a manpage directory, which shows a size 
of 20480 and contains 751 files; 'directory #917711' on dm-0 has a size 
of 8192 and contains 101 files.

The box is a UMP Athlon XP with 512Mb DDR RAM on a VIA VT8237-based
board, using on-board IDE + a Promise 20268 controller (but as the RAID 
layer works, I doubt it's the hardware).

             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-23  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-23  7:33 John Pearson [this message]
2004-03-23  7:54 ` strange ext3 corruption problem on 2.6.x Andrew D Kirch
     [not found] <1zRh6-2V6-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <1zRh6-2V6-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-15 23:25   ` Thorild Selen
     [not found] <20040314222929.GA23106@mark>
2004-03-15  3:41 ` Marc Lehmann
2004-03-18  7:25   ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-13  0:47 Marc Lehmann
2004-03-13  2:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-13  2:40   ` Marc Singer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=405FE85C.5000307@internode.on.net \
    --to=huiac@internode.on.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox